The Four Stages of Learning and What They Mean to Teachers

The Four Stages of Learning and What They Mean to Teachers

Noel Burch worked for Gordon International Training in the 1970s, a company founded by Dr. Thomas Gordon to help train people in various disciplines such as leadership, conflict resolution, personal development, and teaching. Burch came up with a learning model titled “Four Stages of Learning Any New Skill,”and he and Gordon co-authored a book in 1974 titled T.E.T., Teacher Effectiveness Training. The aim of the book was to help teachers to bring out the best in their students and for parents to aid in their child’s learning development. It has been said that great teachers are also great thieves, as they “steal” the proven ideas of others in order to be the best that they can be. Burch’s model works well with teachers in all fields, and golf is no exception – so we’ll “steal” it for our purposes. The model consists of four parts: 1) unconsciously incompetent; 2) consciously incompetent; 3) consciously competent; 4) unconsciously competent. UNCONSCIOUSLY INCOMPETENT Golfers in this stage are doing exactly what this description indicates: They are doing something wrong, but they have no idea what it is, or even if they are indeed doing anything wrong. (Studies have shown that incompetent employees have less stress than competent employees, because since they are basically clueless, they don’t have enough knowledge to know if they’re doing a good job or not – but that’s another topic entirely.) When students first come to us, this is the stage that they find themselves in. We as teachers are tasked with identifying the problems, making the student aware of them, and coming up with the solutions. Students in this stage need a teacher who will be a strong guiding force. This is not to say that student input on the direction they want to go should be ignored, but in the end, the teacher should lay out a game plan and do it authoritatively. This helps instill confidence in the student regarding the teacher’s ability, but more importantly, it gives the student a firm path from which not to deviate, helping to eliminate doubt. CONSCIOUSLY INCOMPETENT The student now is aware of what the problems are and what remedies are needed. It’s okay for them to make some repetitions in this phase with the goal of becoming aware of what their flaws are. Teachers should take great care to still be a strong guiding force in controlling the direction of the lesson. Student feedback is sought, but only for the teacher to modify the direction he or she has laid out. It is detrimental to allow the student to guide the direction of the lesson in this stage, or for the teacher to reduce his or her control. CONSCIOUSLY COMPETENT This is the “turn the corner” stage, where the student has made the change. The student has to consciously think about what he or she is doing, and must be constantly aware of the feel of the change. This is also a “turn the corner” stage for the teacher, who at this point should back away and let the student engage in self-discovery. It is tempting for the teacher to keep reinforcing the instruction given, but it is more important for the student to simply engage in the learning process. This means the teacher should reduce the feedback dramatically, offering instruction only if the student is reverting back to bad habits or is struggling excessively with the new ones. In one sense, control of the lesson has now been handed over to the student. Another option is for the teacher to offer feedback only if the student requests it. Granted, that’s a pretty unconventional approach and isn’t often used, but one that studies have found to be quite effective. A mistake some teachers make in this stage is to assume that the student has successfully made the change, so it’s time to introduce another one. Wrong!  The great Byron Nelson said he only worked on one change at a time, because it was all he could handle. It’s great advice for golf teachers to heed, too. However, this needs to be explained further. Some students may need to make two changes at a time, perhaps one on the backswing and one on the forward. This is fine for most golfers. The admonishment to avoid multiple changes is when you’re working on one change and then decide to add another one to the mix. UNCONSCIOUSLY COMPETENT This is the ultimate stage, where the student is now executing the changes without conscious thought. Think about driving a car: If a car suddenly pulls out in front of you, you automatically and reflexively put on the brake. The same thing applies to golf. The student will now be able to swing without consciously focusing on the new habit. After this occurs, any new changes can now be introduced.

I WOULD VOTE OUT BUBBA

On a popular website I was browsing, there was a voting question on the captain’s Ryder Cup picks. The choice was which person to leave off among Bubba Watson, Rickie Fowler, J.B. Holmes, Matt Kuchar, or Jim Furyk. When you place your vote the results are posted, and although close, the man out was Furyk. He would seem to be the logical choice, not having won a tournament for some time in spite of recently shooting the lowest score ever recorded at a PGA Tour event. In world rankings, he is lower than the others, also. If I were the captain, however, he is the guy I would want on my team. So the logical question – why discard Bubba? He certainly would get the gallery hopped up. My main reason is the course. Hazeltine National is an Open course, narrow fairways, heavy rough and mature trees. I don’t think it favors Bubba off the tee. Yes, he played well at the Olympics, but that was a wide-open course. At the Ryder Cup, we will need balls in the fairway, and Furyk can certainly do that. We will especially need accuracy off the tee in foursome play, an area where the U.S. team is woeful. I have nothing against Bubba; I just think this course is not suited to his game, and Furyk seems to play well on these types of courses. So he got my vote and Bubba didn’t. In any event, whoever the choice, I anticipate an exciting match, another up-and-down to the wire finish.
Slumpbust Like Rory Mcilroy

Slumpbust Like Rory Mcilroy

By: Gregg Steinberg, WGCA contributing writer Not long ago, Rory Mcilroy was the number one player in the world. With four majors, amazing power and youth on his side, it seemed like Rory would dominate golf for years to come. Then he fell into an amazing putting slump. Rory recently mentioned that he lost his confident so bad that he only believed that he could make 3-footers. Anything longer than that would be a struggle—and it was! Then Rory did something very smart to break out of his putting slump. He changed everything. He changed his putting instructor, his grip and his putter. It worked. He went from one of the worst putters on the PGA tour for the past two years to having one the best putting performances at The Deutsche Bank Championships. He won this event with his laser like irons along with his amazing putting! Rory McIlroy was following a psychological process to break out of a slump: Change can help eradicate a slump. Newness of a grip or club gives you a different mindset and with this renewed mindset comes renewed confidence. Next time you are in a slump, or you have a student in a slump, you may want to try a simple strategy: Change. This small step can result in a huge leap in performance for the better. The IGPA is endorsed by the USGTF and the International PGA. Please check out both organizations. The IGPA is running a 1/2 price special on all products. Please contact mentalrules24@msn.com if interested. The IGPA is also running a Sept and Oct promo for the mental game/golf psychology certification course. Type “iggy199” in the promo code to get half off the course. About the author: Dr. Gregg Steinberg is ranked by Golf Digest as one of the world’s greatest sports psychologist. He is the head sports psychologist for the IGPA and USGTF. He has worked with PGA winners such as Brandt Snedeker and Brian Gay as well as NCAA championships  golf teams such as UF and University of Alabama.

TAKING IT TO THE COURSE

Many times, my students talk to me about their inability to score well on the course.  They feel like they strike the ball on the range at a level that would suggest low scores. I take this opportunity to point out the differences between tour pros and everyone else. Tour pros are willing to assess a situation and make the correct decision, based on all of the given circumstances. For instance, in terms of the short game, the pros, the most talented players on the planet, select a club and shot that seems easy to them. They don’t want to use their considerable talent playing hard shots. Instead, they try to play a shot that they are likely to execute 98% of the time. When chipping up a hill, the most accomplished short game players will select a club that allows them to use a small swing and promotes a consistent roll up the slope. Younger players will grab a lofted club that is designed to spin and stop quickly, a club that fights their intent. I put my students through a progression drill. We stand about 10 yards off of the green and pitch to a flag that is 15 yards on the green and up a hill slightly (25 total yards). We begin with a 9-iron. I explain to them that their used to be a “starter” set of clubs that had 3-,5-,7-,and 9-irons only in them; no wedges of any kind. You had to figure out ways to make the 9-iron work. I ask them to open the face slightly with the 9-iron and pitch the ball to the flag. It is important to keep the hands soft and your swing smooth. They soon see that the 9-iron is easy to play the shot with. It flies and bites consistently and rolls to the flag in a dependable manner. Next comes the pitching wedge. They are surprised that the swing that made the 9-iron soft now makes the wedge much softer than normal. The same continues to happen as we progress through the wedges to the most-lofted clubs. This drill takes the violence and unnecessary speed out of our wedge action. My players also see that more loft does NOT necessarily make the shot easier. I explain to them that, as talented players, one of the worst things they can do to themselves is to be one-dimensional. I want my players to look at a shot and know they have four or five clubs in their bag that they could get close to the hole. Advanced understanding of trajectory and spin makes picking landing spots much easier. I need their eyes, and mind, to be wide open. I know of at least one major college golf program that charts proximity to the hole on a short shot like this. I ask my students to picture a person standing by the hole with a clipboard. They are charting the proximity to the hole of every shot and are going to give you an average distance, away from the hole, for each club. Now, logic should tell you to take the club that gives you the best average result. That is the smartest shot. Does the normal student take heed? NO. I know of an instance where a college golf coach took a player out of the starting lineup because he wouldn’t choose the club that was in his best interest. He continued to select shots that were too hard when a simpler option was available. I put a young student through this exercise and was careful to point out the results. From 25 yards, as I described, he was best with the 9-iron. The pitching wedge and gap wedge were progressively worse. The sand wedge was nearly as good as the 9-iron. The lob wedge was not even used. He said to me, “See, the sand wedge IS the best club.” I replied, “Wait a minute. You hit that sand wedge on EVERY shot under 100 yards. It gets all of your focus. Day after day it is in your hands. You hit the 9-iron for 10 minutes and it performs as well, if not better. Doesn’t that tell you something?” Good shotmaking, where balls end up next to the hole, is many times the result of good decision making. Maturity as a player looks like this: You are willing to work on many shots. You become adept at seeing the best shot to play in each situation. Then, you are willing to play the shot with the best club available. You want to use your considerable talent to play a shot that seems easy to you and which you will hardly ever mis-hit. When we understand that our “go-to club” is any club in the bag that simplifies the shot, we have come a long way on our journey to lower scoring. The best players SEE the right shot, PLAY the right shot and USE THE RIGHT CLUB. That is the formula for “taking it to the course.”