BY: John Savage, Langhorne, PA
Level IV Master Teaching Professional & Course Examiner
One of the most important things to an amputee is to find some sort of physical activity. It lifts their spirits and gives them the feeling that they can accomplish more than just being able to walk. They must find a place where they can have fun. Some have found golf. There are many associations they can join, should they seek a competitive outlet. There are numerous clinics conducted across the United States that are sponsored by the Amputee Associations. These clinics are geared towards the hospital and rehab organizations. The clinic basically introduces and demonstrates the devices that have been invented to accommodate the various amputee situations; such as arms, hands, and legs. Golf pros are invited to donate their time for one morning and give brief lessons to the handicapped attendees. When it’s over, the pros go home, and rarely (if ever), get in touch with the rehab people again. Because of the present war, the amputee population is unfortunately growing.
When working with a handicapped person, there are a lot more considerations involved when making swing corrections than with a non-handicapped golfer. After a swing correction is offered and tried by the player, you must ask how the movement affects balance. When you get that answer, you have two options; 1) continue along the lines of the correction, or 2) take another approach because of the affects on balance.
You can see this man has golf shoes on, but they do not contain his feet. That little square box where the red lines are pointing to on each leg, acts as his foot in the prosthetic device. It’s like trying to play golf on stilts. Wearing prosthetics is similar to walking across a very slippery surface. When you walk on a surface like that you use your muscles in a different way in order to keep from falling. Some muscles are tightened up, some are relaxed, and you walk with great caution. Eventually, the body adapts to the movement and muscles get realigned to work with the prosthetic. Your visional perception also changes. Try turning your head while you are walking on that slippery surface: it gets scary. So when a double amputee moves, his head goes with him.
When I first started working with this individual, his left leg was air actuated. When he swung you could actually see and hear it pull up into the body when he shifted his weight on to the leg. His right leg is computer actuated and does a thousand commands a second. The only drawback is that the computer doesn’t know when he has stopped climbing a hill or riding a bike. So he has to stop and let the computer re-boot or the leg will react as if it is still on the bike or climbing. His left leg has since been changed to be vacuum actuated. The vacuum actuated leg makes it easier for him to get his weight onto his left leg during the downswing.
Without rotors on his legs, an amputee is very limited in making any type of golf swing with a rotary motion. Usually they compensate with lateral movement and an overuse of their arms, which is where we began our lessons. After two lessons, I asked him to see if he could get rotors. In his circumstance, the VA pays for the legs, so money was not a problem. A rotor is a device that allows some pivot motion in one direction or another. The limited movement of the rotor is for balance. Rotors are about the size of a silver dollar, and about ½ inch thick. They are set equally at 15 degrees to the left and right on his left leg. The prosthetics can adjust them for more or less rotation. They are activated by twisting or turning the body. For golf, he pushes his upper body down and activates his hips to turn the rotors. When a rotor is added, the height of the foot on the prosthetic device must be narrowed. The left leg rotates in two directions. The right leg rotates 5 degrees for the backswing, allowing him to open his right hip slightly on the backswing. There is no rotor for the forward swing.
A double amputee must keep his prosthetic feet flat during the entire swing. Those little square boxes around ankle height can not tilt, because if they do, he will fall. There is no such thing as coming up on the rear toe to complete the forward swing. As we progress with downswing movement and better hip rotation, we might be able to add a rotor on the right leg for forward movement in the swing. If that rotor is added we will again address the balance issues that the rotor creates. This gets us back to: the more questions you ask a physically handicapped golfer, the better the golf lesson will be.
Recently, I was contacted by a woman who wanted to take a series of lessons with two of her friends. She stated she felt more comfortable being around her friends while trying to learn how to play golf. This comment made me ask her to elaborate on her feelings. She continued on, saying she would be embarrassed to take a one-on-one lesson, and that it would be less intimidating to have some of her friends join her.
This conversation made me think a lot about how I market my lessons and if I was missing out on something. Over the next few weeks, I spoke with some friends about group lessons, and to my surprise, many said they would like to take lessons in a group setting. Some of the reasons they gave were being embarrassed in a one-on-one situation, less cost, and being in a less serious environment if with friends.
To me, I was really excited to market lessons to this niche, helping others learn the sport who might otherwise not even consider individual lessons. By adding a few group lessons a week, I was still keeping my hourly rate where I wanted it to be, but also illustrated to other patrons on the course that there were different avenues to taking lessons.
As golf teaching professionals, we need to step away and think about some of the fears held by our students. Most of us are friendly and easy to talk to, so we might take for granted that some people are just nervous having a professional observe them and possibly criticize their movements. Try to set up a few group lessons and make them fun; you will be surprised how much success it will bring you.
The FedEx Cup has an identity crisis, in my opinion. Here we are, eight years into it, and I still haven’t figured out what it’s supposed to represent. Player of the year? No, that’s done by a vote. Leading money winner? No, the $10 million that goes to the winner is considered bonus money, not official prize money. A season-long reward, as it was originally advertised? No, someone can come out of nowhere and get hot and win. A reward for playing the best in the playoffs? No, because a player can win the first three playoff events, finish second at the Tour Championship, and not win the trophy.
So, what is the FedEx Cup?
My idea helps to give it a bit of an identity, and here it is. First, let’s simplify this thing so it’s easy to follow, instead of using a complicated points system. Re-set everyone at zero points, just like all other sports do. Next, 125 players at the first playoff event, the Barclay’s, are far too many. Let’s cut that down to 75. That represents about the average number of players who make the cut each week, and allows everyone to play all four rounds.
Let the top 60 and ties at the Barclay’s move on to the Deutsche Bank; top 45 and ties from there move on to the BMW; and the top 30 and ties move on to the Tour Championship. The only exceptions are that the regular season points leader (this year it was Rory McIlroy) and all playoff winners automatically qualify for all playoff events, including the Tour Championship. My system prevents everyone else from skipping a playoff event and still getting to play the following week.
Finally, the winner of the Tour Championship should be the FedEx Cup champion, and make the $10 million official prize money, so the winner of the FedEx Cup also has the honor of being the leading money winner.
I believe my idea would vastly improve what the FedEx Cup is now. What do you think?
Recently, I was contacted by a woman who wanted to take a series of lessons with two of her friends. She stated she felt more comfortable being around her friends while trying to learn how to play golf. This comment made me ask her to elaborate on her feelings. She continued on, saying she would be embarrassed to take a one-on-one lesson, and that it would be less intimidating to have some of her friends join her.
This conversation made me think a lot about how I market my lessons and if I was missing out on something. Over the next few weeks, I spoke with some friends about group lessons, and to my surprise, many said they would like to take lessons in a group setting. Some of the reasons they gave were being embarrassed in a one-on-one situation, less cost, and being in a less serious environment if with friends.
To me, I was really excited to market lessons to this niche, helping others learn the sport who might otherwise not even consider individual lessons. By adding a few group lessons a week, I was still keeping my hourly rate where I wanted it to be, but also illustrated to other patrons on the course that there were different avenues to taking lessons.
As golf teaching professionals, we need to step away and think about some of the fears held by our students. Most of us are friendly and easy to talk to, so we might take for granted that some people are just nervous having a professional observe them and possibly criticize their movements. Try to set up a few group lessons and make them fun; you will be surprised how much success it will bring you.
As I was watching the Open from Royal Liverpool, a graphic came on the screen showing all the Championship winners at that venue going back to 1897. They were some of the giants of the game: Hagen, Hilton, Jones, Taylor, Thompson, and De Vincenzo, just to name a few.
Then the commentator for the American broadcast said the following: “And for golfers in the United States, the only familiar name in the group is Tiger Woods.” The two professional golfers in the booth said nothing. I, on the other hand, would have said something like, “Come on, give the American golfer a little more credit than that for historical knowledge.” Then again, very little effort goes into presenting the historical perspective on a golf broadcast these days.
It is sad, really, that a game as old and steeped in tradition as golf has just about abandoned its past. I can be watching a baseball game, and if something out of the ordinary happens, immediately the crew will have details about the last time a play like that occurred, even if it was 100 years ago. I have often wondered why golf is not like that.
A few years back, I wrote a column for Golf Teaching Pro magazine titled, “Don’t just teach golf, teach history, too.” Maybe golf history is not that important on the grand scale of life. But, regardless of the subject, history is relevant to our understanding of other people and ourselves. There are valuable lessons to be learned from the actions of our forbearers. Growing up, I devoured books about the past. When the subject was golf, I learned about honesty from Bobby Jones and competitiveness from Walter Hagen. In a word, history taught me values.
Too bad golf pays so little attention to it today. On the same broadcast, they joked that Bubba Watson had no idea who the Beatles were. Is that something to be proud of? I grew up with the group, but I also know Louie Armstrong, Sinatra, Jolson, and Goodman. That’s because in my time, people thought the past should be remembered. I just wish more people in golf today felt the same way.
Anyone watching this year’s Masters tournament heard the commentators talk about Jordan Spieth’s unusual putting routine of looking at the hole while putting shorter putts inside five feet. He would go through his pre-shot routine, and right before starting his putting stroke, he would look at the hole. Why?
If a player is having a problem releasing the putter or accelerating through the putt, this is a great way to help with that. With your eyes focused on the hole, it is natural for your hands to swing freely towards the target. With the green speeds at Augusta National, it is understandable why someone would be timid with their putting stroke. Jordan must have felt he was not putting freely enough to do this during the last few rounds of the tournament when he was in contention.
Most of us have seen our students decelerate their putting stroke or stop the putter at impact. By having them set up and look at the hole, they will learn the proper sensation of accelerating the putter through the entire stroke. At first, when you have them try this drill, they will often hit the putt harder than normal; this is due to proper release and more acceleration.
I hope this will help with your students’ putting strokes. It has helped with mine. My youngest daughter was struggling on her distance control on her putts this summer. I had her start looking at the hole every time. By doing so, the putter was allowed to have a more consistent swing and rhythm to the stroke. Her speed improved and she made more shots, thus increasing her confidence. As we all know, confidence is key to doing well at anything.
Bad shots are part of the game of golf; we all hit them. After hitting a bad shot, there are different options on what happens next: We can lose our temper while trying to hit a hero shot, or we can stay composed and hit a good shot to get us out of trouble. I have found that one of the things separating great players from the rest of the field is they never follow a bad shot with another bad shot.
Many times, watching the PGA Tour on TV, you will hear the announcer talk about a “comeback birdie.” This is in reference to the player scoring a birdie after having a bogey or worse on the hole before. Competitive golf is a lot about momentum. Executing a good shot after a bad shot helps you keep a positive attitude.
As teaching professionals, we need to teach our students how to keep the wheels from falling off once they hit a bad shot or have a bad hole. Some of this is about teaching how to hit proper recovery shots, and the other is about maintaining a positive attitude when things go south. One great way to teach these skills is to go on the course with your students for playing lessons. It allows you to see how they handle bad situations and what recovery shots they need to learn. In addition, it provides you with an opportunity to get out on the course and play a little golf yourself!
One of the things that fascinates me the most about the golf business, and there is a lot, is that even golf teachers and golf professionals don’t understand the avenues available through the big name original equipment manufacturers to acquire the correct equipment without buying thousands of dollars of poorly matched equipment.
It is an established fact that, through years of research by many different research firms, that the average golf consumer has a ”golf budget”: greens fees, lessons, and equipment. Golf teaching professionals that do not help their students get the right equipment are unwittingly hurting their own business. How? Very simple. When the average golfer buys a mass-produced golf club that doesn’t work with their swing and ball flight, they are wasting a good chunk of their golf budget. Once again, through research, we know that these “off-the-rack golfers” don’t take that many lessons. So, the answer is very simple, and most long-term teachers know this. If they don’t buy the right equipment, they buy more clubs. Hooray for the massive corporations; bad news for the teaching professional. That fourth driver in the last year that Joe Golfer bought could have been spent on instruction. Now, not everyone would spend that on lessons, but a surprising majority would.
Personally, I can tell you honestly there were hundreds of times over the years students would pay for a series a lessons after a club fitting session with me, relieved at finding the correct equipment and the specs that worked with their swing and ball flight. They spent that extra golf money with ME! Not for the third set of irons in six months at the mammoth golf retail store. It’s the same as you may have heard about the large casinos in Vegas. How do you think they got so big?
The most pressing problem is that even golf professionals don’t know that every OEM has a custom department in their assembly facility. Two companies, Ping and Mizuno, generate 80% of their sales through their custom department.
Basically, iron sets, drivers, wedges, hybrids, and even putters are assembled two ways, not counting the tour department that takes care of the obvious. One of the components, and the most profitable one, for all companies is the component of the company that produces one type of shaft, one lie angle, one length, one static weight, one swing weight, one loft, one grip size and one set makeup – the dreaded “off-the-rack” set: mass-produced, boxed up and sent to the large big box stores to sell off the shelf to the uneducated golfer by the uneducated retail clerk. Or, even worse, by the uninformed golf professional. One of the worst things about these clubs is the inexpensive and poorly designed “stock” shafts used. Of course, among other things, they just have one-size-fits-all specifications.
Let me ask you something. Have you ever seen two identical golf swings? Same path and face angle? Same angle of attack, same tempo? Same club head speed? Same toe deflection? Take all of those variables and mix them up. Are you serious? Do you really think there are two golfers that have all of those variables exactly the same?
The other component of the OEMs’ manufacturing occurs in the custom department. To the average golfer, this sounds expensive, right? Wrong. Most OEMs offer no-charge shaft upgrades on many shafts. For example, one of the largest companies in the history of the golf equipment industry offers five different aftermarket shafts on all of their iron sets for FREE. You could fit you your students to a different lie, different loft, upgraded aftermarket shafts that fits them better (and better quality, by the way), different size grip, and the cost would be…FREE! Yes, that’s right, for those that don’t know. All the OEMs offer no-extra-charge custom-made clubs, woods, irons, putters, and hybrids through their CUSTOM department. Some OEMs charge a minimal amount for some shafts, $3 to $10 per club. All other specs, including grip size, are FREE.
Do they make the same profit on the custom department sets? Of course not. That’s why they don’t advertise it. Even the sales reps push off-the-rack clubs at demo days.
Educate yourself. Educated your golfer. Sell more series, and at the same time, make your golfer better by helping them get better-fit equipment. They will be grateful, and you will be a better teaching professional. The massive-size conglomerates will make a little less profit. So, the star tour player gets 8 mil this year instead of 9 mil. Do you really care? I know your student won’t.
LEARNING A SKILL, PART 1
A successful teacher can transmit his information to the student in the most effective manner possible. To help achieve this goal, it is important to understand how the student receives the information the teachers is sending him. Rather than delve into theories of learning a skill, use simple techniques to reach a student without the scientific clutter, although the goals are the same.
Sports performance is basically how one’s psychomotor skills react to achieve a goal. The term “muscle memory” is misleading. Information is stored in the body’s computer – the brain. The brain is what stores memories.
Many sports have similar actions and movements. All sports that require body rotation rely on the same core muscles as the source of stability and power. Therefore, when a student has already performed other sports, often it is easy to transmit the same images to the golf swing.
Too often a teacher pushes a student with excessive images and thoughts that lead to “overload.” Try this experiment. Hand a beginning golfer a golf club and tell him to hit the ball. That’s all. Most of the time, they will make contact.
LEARNING A SKILL, PART 2
The golf swing is basically a natural movement. When a child picks up a stick and swings at a pine cone, nobody explains the techniques of “hitting a pine cone.” Therefore, in your teaching, try to start as basic as possible. Let the movement begin naturally and let it ingrain with repetition. In many cases, less is more.
The same can be said with advanced golfers. Often, good golfer feels as if a swing change is a huge undertaking, when in reality, it might be as simple as a few centimeters. Even advanced golfers should work on simple drills and exercises to “age” a swing change.
For example, I have a client who is a scratch golfer. Since he was a child, he had a huge loop in his swing. He came to me one day and said, “The loop in my swing is gone! I have worked it out! Watch me hit some balls, Pro.”
As I watched a few shots, every ball was straight down the middle, but the loop was still there. In his mind it was gone and his performance was elevated. For the next year, we didn’t let him see his video and I gradually worked the loop out little by little. He was hardly aware of it because I kept the drills simple, never more than one exercise at a time.
Important points to remember when teaching a skill:
• Let natural ability guide your students.
• Limit the amount of information, especially with beginner golfers.
Old ingrained habits can be changed. It is simply a matter of:
• Understanding the fault.
• Finding a simple, effective exercise or thought to correct the fault.
• Repeating and aging the correct movement.
The brain is a powerful instrument. If we can find a simple way to correct a fault, we can have immediate results. But, often when a golfer finds a way to correct a fault, he thinks that after a few shots that all is cured.
In reality, to produce a correct repeating motion one has to:
• Age the correct motion until it is ingrained,
and / or
• Have a clear mental focus with a simple thought to produce the correct movement.
There was a lot of brown showing in the recent U.S. Opens hosted at Pinehurst #2, along with several weeds around the edges of the course. On television, it looked a little ragged compared to most American golf courses that host tournaments on a weekly basis. In reality, most municipal courses in the country look more like Pinehurst than Augusta, and experience unfair criticism as a result. It takes a lot of water to keep grass green on the fairways, and water is becoming more and more a commodity we should not waste. Pinehurst now uses 70 percent less water per year, and from what I could see, the course played very well and was enjoyed by all the participants.
The golf courses I grew up on did not get irrigation systems until the late ‘60s, and it was common for the fairways to turn brown during hot, dry summers. No one complained as long as the greens were good. Oftentimes, we looked forward to the browning, because 230-yard drives were rolling out to 260 or more. In 1968, the primary course I grew up on got a new watering system. After all, back then everything was cheap. Hershey bars were a nickel. Water was free, or at least we thought so. Within a few years, if so much as a brown spot showed up on the course, the members were screaming. The term “dirt track” became the tag on any course that did not drown their fairways with liquid refreshment.
We got spoiled and failed to think of the future. Even now, very few want to bite the bullet and step back a bit. Maybe it will take something like a brown U.S. Open to open our eyes.